Menu
Backlit bottles of various shapes and sizes sit on shelves in a bar.
Image: Kondor83/iStock/Getty Images Plus

About Half of Drinkers on GLP-1s Say They Imbibed Less

This unexpected side effect was higher in those at risk of unhealthy alcohol use

Research 5 min read
By ALVIN POWELL | Harvard Gazette

At a glance

  • Nearly half of drinkers who take GLP-1 medications have reported declines in alcohol consumption.

  • The effect was higher among those at risk of unhealthy alcohol use.

  • The study was sparked by reports of this unexpected side effect amid the rising popularity of these drugs for diabetes and weight loss.

The future of federally funded research at Harvard Medical School — supported by taxpayers and done in service to humanity — remains uncertain. Learn more.

Nearly half of drinkers who take GLP-1 medications have reported declines in alcohol consumption, with the effect higher among those at risk of unhealthy alcohol use, a new study led by Harvard Medical School researchers shows.

The federally funded work, published in JAMA Psychiatry in October, explores an unexpected and head-turning side effect of GLP-1s used to treat diabetes and obesity.

Get more HMS news

The drugs’ effectiveness, particularly for weight loss, have caused them to skyrocket in popularity. As use spread, anecdotal evidence emerged about improvements in heart health and mental well-being, and reduced cravings for alcohol among patients.

Researchers from the Department of Health Care Policy in the Blavatnik Institute at HMS and McLean Hospital worked on the study with collaborators from Brown, Duke, and Brandeis universities and Boston-based RAND Corporation.

Medications for alcohol use disorder are underused

The study grew out of work by senior author Haiden Huskamp, the Henry J. Kaiser Professor of Health Care Policy at HMS, and co-author Alisa Busch, HMS professor of psychiatry at McLean and associate professor of health care policy at HMS, on the underuse of medications to treat alcohol use disorder.

Anti-abuse medications have existed for decades — disulfiram, the oldest, has been around since the 1940s. But their use has been vanishingly small.

Just 3 percent to 5 percent of those with a past alcohol abuse disorder reported using the drugs in a recent national survey, and only 10 percent of those seeking treatment have received the approved drugs.

“The national surveys show that far and away most people with alcohol use disorder receive no treatment, period,” Busch said. “We have this evidence-based treatment that’s efficacious, so what are the patient characteristics, the clinician characteristics associated with being prescribed or not prescribed these medications?”

A surprising side effect of GLP-1s

Busch, Huskamp, and their team took notice as accounts emerged about reduced cravings to drink among patients on GLP-1s. As reports multiplied and GLP-1s’ effect on individuals became clearer, the two wanted to better understand the phenomenon on a population level.

“We wanted to really understand patient perception of this issue, and a large share of people taking GLP-1s are saying they’re drinking less,” Huskamp said.

The current study, supported by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, surveyed RAND’s American Life Panel, a group of adults from across the nation who are issued internet-connected devices to complete surveys, in March and April 2026. Of 2,009 who completed the initial survey, 368 reported current or past use of GLP-1s, and 242 said they were drinkers when they began taking a GLP-1.

Of those reporting drinking while on GLP-1s, 44.2 percent, or 106, said they consumed less. Most of the rest reported no change, with three saying they drank more.

Screening for unhealthy alcohol use

The survey also asked a single screening question for unhealthy alcohol use: whether at any single time in the previous year the respondent had imbibed enough to be considered heavy drinking — four drinks for women, five for men, according to the National Institutes of Health.

The authors defined that group as GLP-1 users at risk for unhealthy drinking. They found 54.1 percent of that population reported drinking less, 40.2 percent said there was no change, and 5.7 percent — three individuals — were drinking more.

“Because all of the evidence had been anecdotal when we started this study, it was hard to know what to expect,” Huskamp said. “But finding that about half of GLP-1 users who drink reported reductions in their alcohol use after starting the medication is pretty striking.”

Huskamp and Busch cautioned against leaping to the conclusion that GLP-1s should join other medications approved to treat alcohol use disorder because the study screened for potentially unhealthy use, not alcohol use disorder — a clinical diagnosis for those whose drinking causes significant disruption to daily life and health.

Also missing from the analysis was evidence of the magnitude of the decline in drinking.

“We weren’t testing GLP-1s for efficacy in reducing alcohol use. We’d need a randomized control trial for that,” Busch said. “We were trying to understand, in a population at higher risk for harmful drinking, is there a difference in their experience of drinking alcohol compared to individuals who screen negative.”

Another significant finding was that the awareness about reduced alcohol consumption among those taking GLP-1s was low. Just 10 percent of all those surveyed said they had heard that GLP-1s might lower drinking.

Those deeper questions about the potential utility of GLP-1s to reduce alcohol consumption await the results of clinical trials — some of which have already begun — designed to answer those questions.

“The evidence isn’t there, but it will be very interesting to watch over the next couple of years,” Huskamp said. “There are trials underway. I don’t expect it to take too long before more evidence starts coming through.”

Adapted from a Harvard Gazette news story.

Authorship, funding, disclosures

Additional authors include Lori Uscher-Pines, Jessica Sousa, Ateev Mehrotra, Andrew Muzyk, Dominic Hodgkin, and Shelly Greenfield.

This research was funded by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (grants R01AA029267 and R01AA030539).

Busch reported receiving grants from the National Institute on Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse (NIAAA) during the conduct of the study. Mehrotra reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) during the conduct of the study. Hodgkin reported receiving grants from NIAAA (R01AA029267) during the conduct of the study. Greenfield reported receiving grants from NIH/National Institute on Drug Abuse during the conduct of the study; receiving honoraria for continuing education talks in spring 2025 at Rutgers University and Montefiore/Einstein; and receiving book royalties from Guilford Press. Huskamp reported receiving grants from NIAAA during the conduct of the study and serving as a member of the NIAAA National Advisory Council on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.