
What would you do if you were offered an opportunity to peer review a paper that includes research similar to a study you are about to submit for publication?
When feeling pressure to produce high-impact work in order to obtain funding or publish, how do you avoid rushing that could lead you to inadvertently misreport data?
How do you manage personality conflicts among people in your lab?
As part of the multifaceted process of conducting rigorous, reproducible research, scientists often grapple with challenging questions. While there are hard-and-fast rules for certain matters, many issues require interpretation and judgment to arrive at fair and ethical decisions.
Luckily, research ethics can be taught. Doing so equips young scientists to resolve knotty problems, avoid ethically compromising situations, and behave sensitively with collaborators and trainees.
The U.S. government mandates instruction in the responsible conduct of research for students and trainees who receive grants from agencies such as the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation.
Harvard Medical School goes even further to safeguard research integrity by requiring training for all its PhD students and postdoctoral fellows, regardless of whether they are federally funded. This helps ensure that the next generation of HMS-trained biomedical researchers is behaving responsibly and ethically.
The way HMS delivers the instruction is also distinctive.
Grounding PhD students in research ethics
At HMS, PhD students take the Responsible Conduct of Science (RCOS) course during their second year and a refresher course during their sixth year. This allows the curriculum to be tailored to their experience level.
In 2024, nearly 300 PhD students enrolled — 179 second-years and 114 sixth-years. More than 30 junior and senior HMS faculty members from the School and its affiliated hospitals teach the course each year as volunteers, sharing a range of expertise to guide the future biomedical research workforce.
While it might be more efficient to deliver a few large lectures, HMS provides approximately 30 sections each fall with just 8–12 students in each — an approach that is regarded by the NIH as the gold standard, said Aimee Hollander, course coordinator and lecturer on microbiology in the Blavatnik Institute at HMS.
The curriculum is case-based, and the small sections allow faculty and students to engage deeply in discussions about challenging real-life scenarios.
“The small-group discussions are useful because that’s how you will encounter the problems in practice, in small groups in a lab or research group at a company,” said James Warner, an eighth-year Harvard Kenneth C. Griffin Graduate School of Arts and Sciences doctoral student in the HMS Biological and Biomedical Sciences Sciences Program in Genetics and Genomics.
“It’s good that the School gives you protected time to explicitly talk about these important issues when there aren’t other stakes involved like getting a paper out or going over a hurdle for a grant application,” Warner added.
The courses undergo continuous improvement, including ongoing facilitator training and a recent overhaul of the learning objectives by a group of science education leaders known as HMS Curriculum Fellows.
Training early-career scientists in responsible conduct
Postdoctoral researchers in the Blavatnik Institute at HMS are expected to take nine Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) classes during their time at the School. Usually, they complete the requirement during the first year of their research experience. Postdocs from all Harvard schools and HMS affiliates are welcome to enroll.