Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM)—a disease in which cardiac muscle thickens, weakening the heart—can be prevented from developing for several months in mice by reducing production of a mutant protein, according to a new study by researchers at Harvard Medical School.
The work takes a first step toward being able to treat or prevent the leading cause of sudden death in athletes and sudden heart-related death in people under 30 in the United States.
“There’s really no treatment for HCM right now. You can treat symptoms like chest pain or an arrhythmia, but that’s not getting at the fundamental problem,” said Christine Seidman, the Thomas W. Smith Professor of Medicine and Genetics at HMS and Brigham and Women's Hospital, a Howard Hughes Medical Investigator and senior author of the study. “While the application of this strategy is in the very early stages, it shows considerable promise.”
The results were published in Science on Oct. 3.
An estimated 1 in 500 Americans has HCM. Although many of them never develop symptoms, for others the disease can be severe or fatal.
More than 1,000 different mutations that can cause HCM have been identified across about 10 genes that make heart muscle proteins. People with HCM have one “good” copy and one “bad” copy of one of those genes.
Studying one of the mutations that causes particularly severe disease, Christine Seidman and Jonathan Seidman, Henrietta B. and Frederick H. Bugher Foundation Professor of Genetics at HMS, worked with research fellow Jianming Jiang and instructor Hiroko Wakimoto to target the analogous “bad” gene in mice while leaving the “good” gene alone.
The researchers created an RNA interference (RNAi) tool designed to home in on the single HCM-causing mutation and stop it from making its harmful protein. They packaged the RNAi inside a virus (a common RNAi delivery technique) and injected it into lab mice engineered to develop HCM. They compared the results to two untreated groups of mice: one with the same HCM mutation, and one without.
By suppressing the “bad” gene, the RNAi was able to reduce production of the mutant protein by about 28 percent. That was enough to prevent development of HCM manifestations—including ventricular wall overgrowth, cell disorganization and fibrosis (scarring)—for about six months, or one-quarter of the mice's lifespans.
"For all intents and purposes, the heart looked normal," said Christine Seidman. "Wonderfully, boringly normal."
The treatment successfully targeted heart cells in the mice without affecting other organs. Although it did not reverse any existing HCM damage, Jonathan Seidman noted that halting the progress of HCM would be a significant advance in itself.
"If somebody already had a certain amount of wall thickness and you prevent it from worsening, that would be a step forward to limit progressive symptoms and development of heart failure," he said.
In addition to its potential for informing HCM treatment in humans down the road, the initial findings could be relevant for a related genetic condition called dilated cardiomyopathy, where the heart becomes baggy and thin-walled and contracts too little instead of too much.
The researchers now plan to investigate whether they can continue to delay HCM in mice with booster shots, reverse disease damage or reduce HCM-related arrhythmias. They would like to study a larger animal model as well as explore whether younger mice respond better to therapy than older mice and if interventions aimed at specific areas of the heart could be as effective as treating the whole heart.
The team also intends to explore whether a collection of about 10 RNAis could be engineered to target common genetic variants that are tightly linked to HCM mutations, instead of having to develop 1,000 mutation-specific RNAis.
The Seidmans are founders of and own shares in MyoKardia, a biotechnology company developing small molecules that target the sarcomere (the cellular structure that contracts in heart muscle) for treatment of inherited cardiomyopathy.
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01HL09166 and R01HL084553) and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
Jonathan Tang had a problem. A graduate student studying neural circuitry in the retina, he wanted to do more than identify fluorescent cells that send signals to the brain. He sought to understand how these specialized cells called bipolar neurons develop and function in the eye’s retina. More than “Here they are,” he hoped to say, “Here’s what they do.”
Frustrated by the lack of available tools, he created his own. Tang, with Constance Cepko, HMS Bullard Professor of Genetics and Neuroscience, and other collaborators, transformed green fluorescent protein (GFP), a glowing biomarker borrowed from jellyfish, into a scaffold that can bring together protein fragments to enable gene manipulation, or other useful activities.
Their method, described Aug. 15 in Cell, enables scientists to probe how cells function not only in the retina, but also in other tissues. The tool also works with the promising technology called optogenetics, in which scientists use light to control individual cells.
To solve his problem, Tang took a step back to look more closely at GFP. The green glow produced by this jellyfish protein has become a workhorse of science, literally illuminating pathways and processes in lab dishes and living animal models since its Nobel Prize-winning discovery in 1961 and application in 1994. With it, scientists can observe molecular biology occurring in more than 1,500 transgenic GFP strains in mice and other organisms, many of which label unique populations of cell types.
An invaluable resource, GFP is nonetheless limited to tagging cells. If scientists want to control gene activity, particularly in the mouse, they turn to another workhorse molecule, Cre recombinase, an enzyme that can shuffle DNA and is primarily used in the mouse. Not nearly as many mouse strains have been made to express Cre as have GFP, so for Tang to learn not just where bipolar cells are in the retina, but also how they develop and connect to other cell types, additional transgenic mice would need to be generated and characterized.
Tang decided not to wait. After all, he had a PhD to complete.
“Jonathan is the star of the story,” Cepko said. “We would sit and talk about how we had all these GFP lines we couldn't use to derive functional information. He came up with this idea that worked fantastically well, namely, to use the GFP to control biological activity specifically in cells already tagged with GFP.”
To get there, Tang focused not so much on the green fluorescence in GFP as on its possible uses as a protein. By itself GFP doesn’t alter cell function—an asset as a biomarker—but perhaps it could be combined with other proteins that affect gene activity. In that sense, GFP and its partners could act as both biomarker and synthetic system for controlling genes.
Searching for proteins that would bind to GFP, Tang discovered that a group of scientists in Germany had identified molecules that could bind to GFP. Derived from camel antibodies prized for their simple structure and high affinity, these proteins retained their ability to bind to GFP after they were introduced into a cell. Tang realized that this property could be exploited to create an array of tools that could enable the GFP-binding proteins to do much more. He constructed a series of chimeric, or fusion, proteins, fusing protein domains that can control transcription to these GFP-binding proteins. When two such fusion proteins that can bind simultaneously to GFP are introduced into a cell, GFP brings them together, triggering the designed co-dependent activity of the fusion proteins.
The scientists tested their tool in the retina, using it to switch on a fluorescent reporter gene in one experiment and to knock out a gene in another. As a boost to those who study neural function, they could trigger expression of channelrhodopsin, a protein that allows neural circuits to be controlled with light, thereby linking expression of GFP to the powerful tools of optogenetics.
The tool worked in tissue culture as well as in living mice and zebrafish, another animal model favored by investigators.
“We can now use this as a way to access genetically defined cell types to see what’s essential for development, behavior, neural circuit processing—or whatever one wants to study,” said Tang.
“We can use these methods to probe function and development in the retina, but whatever your tissue is, you should be able to use these methods to study it,” Cepko said. “You don’t have to make a transgenic mouse or even have a GFP strain. You may be able to find an endogenous protein, or maybe even an RNA, that’s specific to your interest and do exactly what we did to make our tool.”
The study authors were supported by the Leonard and Isabelle Goldenson Research Fellowship, a European Research Council grant, a Swiss-Hungarian grant, TREATRUSH, SEEBETTER and OPTONEURO grants from the European Union and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
The Broad Institute and Massachusetts General Hospital are launching a new initiative to perform large-scale exome sequencing in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a diagnosis—including Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis—that faces considerable unmet therapeutic need.
The recent emergence of rapid, efficient genome-sequencing technologies and the compelling evidence for the role of genetics in these disorders have motivated the founding of a collaborative sequencing effort between the two institutions with ties to Harvard Medical School. The endeavor will be geared toward the discovery of high-impact genetic variants influencing IBD risk that can serve as guides to future therapeutic development and diagnostic tools.
The initiative will be directed by experienced IBD researchers from Mass General and the Broad Institute, but it also aims to develop an exome-sequencing network that will allow researchers to partner and collaborate worldwide. Two large pilot exome-sequencing projects are being launched immediately as part of this initiative based on established genetic study designs that heighten the discovery of rare, high-impact risk and protective variants. The exome is the small portion of the genome that translates DNA into proteins.
Early-onset pediatric IBD
A major focus of the work will surround full-exome sequencing of the earliest-onset childhood IBD cases. It has long been recognized in many diseases that penetrant genetic risk factors—mutations in people who have symptoms—are much more likely to be found in cases with unusually early onset. The Broad Institute has completed more than 50,000 exomes in the past two years. Its technical expertise in generating and processing such sequencing data, along with population-level genetic variation patterns from these experiments, will provide a foundation for obtaining the best outcomes in the interpretation of these cases. Samples with IBD onset before 6 years of age—and in some cases going up to age 10—collected by IBD researchers around the world are welcome for inclusion in this study.
Adult-onset IBD case-control study
Genetic mapping has provided dramatic insights into IBD pathogenesis in recent years, but a substantial amount of heritability—in particular the role of strong-acting rare mutations—is yet to be elucidated. To deliver those insights, IBD cases with an unusually low burden of known genetic risk factors (particularly emphasizing those with positive family history, or from isolated or enriched populations, or both) will be contrasted with population controls that have an extremely high burden of known IBD risk factors, enhancing discovery of critical protective variants that may provide the best clues for therapeutic development. This project will also be initiated as an international collaboration, particularly among researchers with sample sets with Immunochip genotyping that will enable the immediate genetic identification of these enriched target populations. Immunochip is a tool that samples 200,000 sites in the genome previously tied to autoimmune and inflammatory diseases.
The National Human Genome Research Institute Large-Scale Sequencing Program will support pilot work for this project in the next 12 months, with all generated data made publicly available to the research community through standard National Institutes of Health databases.
“Genetics offers a peek into the pathways that protect against—or predispose to—the development of IBD,” said Ramnik Xavier, HMS professor of medicine and chief of gastroenterology at Mass General and a senior associate member at the Broad Institute. “Contributing results to public resources will allow the data to be integrated by researchers from a variety of disciplines. In the current research environment, important advances in biology are often made by finding innovative ways to analyze ‘big data,’ and I believe this open-access exome-sequencing project will provide an example of how publicly available data can inspire significant progress in the field of IBD.”
“This project will enable IBD genetics to take further leaps forward toward a clear and therapeutically actionable understanding of the molecular causes of disease,” said Mark Daly, HMS associate professor of medicine and chief of the Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit at Mass General and a senior associate member at the Broad Institute. “It is extremely exciting to be able to launch this transformative initiative as an international collaboration with rapid and open data sharing.”
An international research team has used a novel approach to identify genetic factors that appear to influence susceptibility to cholera, a disease that affects from 3 to 5 million people each year and causes more than 100,000 deaths. The findings indicate the importance of pathways involved in regulating water loss in intestinal cells and highlight the innate immune system’s key role in the body’s response to the bacteria that causes cholera.
The work involved investigators from Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital; the Broad Institute; and the International Center for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh.
“We sought to understand cholera by studying the genetics of a population that has been affected by the disease for centuries: people in the Ganges River Delta of Bangladesh,” said Regina LaRocque, an assistant professor of medicine at Mass General and a co-senior author of the report published in Science Translational Medicine. “Our findings are just a first step, but they demonstrate how combining ancient history with the current impact of an infectious disease can be a powerful way of identifying human genes that are important to disease outcome.”
People contract cholera by consuming water or food contaminated with the bacteria Vibrio cholerae, which releases a toxic protein upon reaching the small intestine. This toxin binds to the intestinal surface, causing severe diarrhea and sometimes death from dehydration. Cholera or cholera-like illnesses have been reported in the Ganges Delta for centuries, and most recent global outbreaks of the disease originated in that region.
A potential fingerprint of cholera’s genetic impact could be the relative rarity in the region of people with blood type O, which confers an increased risk of severe cholera symptoms. The persistence of cholera in the Ganges Delta would be expected to exert an evolutionary force on the population, since individuals with gene variants that reduce their susceptibility to the disease would be more likely to survive and pass those variants along to their children.
To search for genomic regions that affect cholera susceptibility, the team employed a new two-step approach. The first step, developed by the Broad team, used a method called Composite of Multiple Signals (CMS) to scan the genomes of 126 individuals from the Ganges Delta for patterns that signal a long-term increase in the prevalence of particular DNA segments, indicating the effects of natural selection. That scan identified 305 regions under selective pressure, many of which are involved in two important biologic functions. One is regulation of the passage of water through intestinal cells via structures called potassium channels and the other is a signaling pathway involved in both the innate immune system and the maintenance of the intestinal lining.
The second step directly tested the potential impact of these selected regions on cholera susceptibility by comparing the genomes of 105 cholera patients from the region with the genomes of 167 individuals who did not contract the disease, despite being exposed to it in their homes. That comparison found that the genomic region most strongly associated with cholera susceptibility in this population was one that the CMS scan indicated was under strong selection pressure. Genes in this region relate to an innate immune signaling pathway. LaRocque’s team had previously shown this pathway to be activated by exposure to cholera toxin, and the current study identified the potential involvement of several additional genes in that pathway
“Understanding the basic biology of a disease is fundamental to making clinically relevant advances in treatment,” said LaRocque. “Our laboratory is now working on further studies of the innate immune response to cholera, and we believe this work will be highly relevant to developing improved vaccines.”
Support for the study includes National Institutes of Health grants TW007409, AI058935, AI079198 and NIH Innovator Award DP2-OD006514-01; grants from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the American Cancer Society and the Packard Foundation; and an MGH Claflin Distinguished Scholar Award.
Adapted from a Mass General news release.
A biomarker reflecting expression levels of two genes in tumor tissue may be able to predict which women treated for estrogen-receptor-positive (ER positive) breast cancer should receive a second estrogen-blocking medication after completing tamoxifen treatment. In their report published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, HMS researchers at the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center describe finding that the HOXB13/IL17BR ratio can indicate which women are at risk for cancer recurrence after tamoxifen and which are most likely to benefit from continuing treatment with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole.
“Most patients with early-stage, estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer remain cancer-free after five years of tamoxifen treatment, but they remain at risk of recurrence for 15 years or longer after their initial treatment,” said Dennis Sgroi, HMS professor of pathology at Mass General and lead author of the report. “Our biomarker identifies the subgroup of patients who continue to be at risk of recurrence after tamoxifen treatment and who will benefit from extended therapy with letrozole, which should allow many women to avoid unnecessary extended treatment.”
Previous research by Sgroi’s team, in collaboration with investigators from bioTheranostics Inc., discovered that the ratio between levels of expression of two genes—HOXB13 and IL17BR—in tumor tissue predicted the risk of recurrence of ER-positive, lymph-node-negative breast cancer, whether or not the patient was treated with tamoxifen. The current study of patients from MA.17, the highly successful clinical trial of letrozole, was designed to go further. It would evaluate the usefulness of the HOXB13/IL17BR ratio for predicting which tamoxifen-treated patients remained at risk of recurrence, but it also sought to identify who could benefit from continued treatment with letrozole.
To answer those questions, the investigators analyzed primary tumor samples and patient data from the placebo-controlled MA.17 trial, which confirmed the ability of extended letrozole therapy to improve survival after the completion of tamoxifen treatment. Tissue samples were available from 83 patients whose tumors recurred during the study period (31 who had received letrozole and 52 in the placebo group) and 166 patients with no recurrence (91 who had received letrozole and 75 who got the placebo).
Analysis of the tumor samples revealed that a high HOXB13/IL17BR ratio—meaning the expression level of HOXB13 is greater than that of IL17BR—predicts an increased risk for tumor recurrence after tamoxifen therapy, but that elevated risk drops significantly if a patient receives letrozole.
“This discovery means that about 60 percent of women with the most common kind of breast cancer can be spared unnecessary treatment with the concomitant side effects and costs,” said Paul Goss, HMS professor of medicine, director of the Breast Cancer Research Program at the MGH Cancer Center and a co-author of the report. “But more important, the 40 percent of patients who are at risk of recurrence can now be identified as needing continued therapy with letrozole, and many will be spared death from breast cancer.”
Goss and Sgroi noted that their findings need to be validated by additional studies before they can be put into clinical practice.
The study was supported by National Institute of Health grant R01-CA112021, Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program grant W81XWH-04-1-0606, and grants from the Avon Foundation, the Breast Cancer Foundation, the NCI SPORE in breast cancer at MGH, and Novartis.
Adapted from a Mass General news release.
In the past year a group of synthetic proteins called CRISPR-Cas RNA-guided nucleases (RGNs) have generated great excitement in the scientific community as gene-editing tools. Exploiting a method that some bacteria use to combat viruses and other pathogens, CRISPR-Cas RGNs can cut through DNA strands at specific sites, allowing new genetic material to be inserted.
Now a team of HMS researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital has found a significant limitation to the method’s use: CRISPR-Cas RGNs produce unwanted DNA mutations at sites other than the desired target.
“We found that expression of CRISPR-Cas RGNs in human cells can have off-target effects that, surprisingly, can occur at sites with significant sequence differences from the targeted DNA site,” said J. Keith Joung, HMS associate professor of pathology at Mass General and associate chief of pathology, research in the Mass General Department of Pathology. He is co-senior author of the report published online in Nature Biotechnology. “RGNs continue to have tremendous advantages over other genome-editing technologies, but these findings have now focused our work on improving their precision.”
Consisting of a DNA-cutting enzyme called Cas9, coupled with a short, 20-nucleotide segment of RNA that matches the target DNA segment, CRISPR-Cas RGNs mimic the primitive immune systems of certain bacteria. When these microbes are infected by viruses or other organisms, they copy a segment of the invader’s genetic code and incorporate it into their DNA, passing it on to future bacterial generations. If the same pathogen is encountered in the future, the bacterial enzyme Cas9, guided by an RNA sequence that matches the copied DNA segment, inactivates the pathogen by cutting its DNA at the target site.
About a year ago, scientists reported the first use of programmed CRISPR-Cas RGNs to target and cut specific DNA sites. Since then several research teams, including Joung’s, have successfully used CRISPR-Cas RGNs to make genomic changes in fruit flies, zebrafish, mice and in human cells—including induced pluripotent stem cells that have many of the characteristics of embryonic stem cells. The technology’s reliance on such a short RNA segment makes CRISPR-Cas RGNs much easier to use than other gene-editing tools called zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs). RGNs can also be programmed to introduce several genetic changes at the same time.
The possibility that CRISPR-Cas RGNs might cause additional, unwanted genetic changes has been largely unexplored, so Joung’s team set out to investigate the occurrence of “off-target” mutations in human cells expressing CRISPR-Cas RGNs. Since the interaction between the guiding RNA segment and the target DNA relies on only 20 nucleotides, they hypothesized that the RNA might also recognize DNA segments that differed from the target by a few nucleotides.
Although previous studies had found that a single-nucleotide mismatch could prevent the action of some CRISPR-Cas RGNs, the MGH team’s experiments in human cell lines found multiple instances in which mismatches of as many as five nucleotides did not prevent cleavage of an off-target DNA segment. They also found that the rates of mutation at off-target sites could be as high as, or even higher than, those at the targeted site, something that has not been observed with off-target mutations associated with ZFNs or TALENs.
“Specificity is important both for research and especially for gene therapy,” George Church, the Robert Winthrop Professor of Genetics at HMS, said about Joung’s report. “This is the first paper to seriously address this topic. The next big question is how to reduce the off-target ratio to on-target.”
In January, Church reported in Science on research using the genome-editing tool. While he was not involved in the current study reported in Nature Biotechnology, Church and Joung are collaborators. Together with George Daley, HMS professor of biological chemistry and molecular pharmacology, and Kun Zhang, associate professor of bioengineering at the University of California at San Diego, they are co-principal investigators of a National Human Genome Research Institute Center for Excellence in Genomic Science.
Joung said RGNs remain valuable.
“Our results don’t mean that RGNs cannot be important research tools, but they do mean that researchers need to account for these potentially confounding effects in their experiments. They also suggest that the existing RGN platform may not be ready for therapeutic applications,” said Joung. “We are now working on ways to reduce these off-target effects, along with methods to identify all potential off-target sites of any given RGN in human cells so that we can assess whether any second-generation RGN platforms that are developed will be actually more precise on a genome-wide scale. I am optimistic that we can further engineer this system to achieve greater specificity so that it might be used for therapy of human diseases.”
Support for the study includes National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director’s Pioneer Award DP1 GM105378; NIH grants R01 GM088040 and P50 HG005550, DARPA grant W911NF-11-2-0056, and the Jim and Ann Orr MGH Research Scholar Award.
Adapted from a Mass General news release.
A new method of measuring the variety of genetic mutations found in cells within a tumor appears to predict treatment outcomes of patients with the most common type of head and neck cancer. In the May 20 issue of the journal Cancer, HMS investigators at Massachusetts General Hospital and Massachusetts Eye and Ear described how their way of measuring tumor heterogeneity was a better predictor of survival than are most traditional risk factors in a small group of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
“Our findings will eventually allow better matching of treatments to individual patients, based on this characteristic of their tumors,” said Edmund Mroz, HMS associate professor of physiology in the Department of Otology and Laryngology at Mass General’s Center for Cancer Research and lead author of the Cancer paper. “This method of measuring heterogeneity can be applied to most types of cancer, so our work should help researchers determine whether a similar relationship between heterogeneity and outcome occurs in other tumors.”
For decades investigators have hypothesized that tumors with a high degree of genetic heterogeneity—the result of different subgroups of cells undergoing different mutations at different DNA sites—would be more difficult to treat because particular subgroups might be more likely to survive a particular drug or radiation or to have spread before diagnosis. While recent studies have identified specific genes and proteins that can confer treatment resistance in tumors, there previously has been no convenient way to measure tumor heterogeneity.
Working in the laboratory of James Rocco, who is the HMS Daniel Miller Associate Professor of Otology and Laryngology at Mass Eye and Ear, Mroz and his colleagues developed their new method by analyzing advanced gene-sequencing data to produce a value reflecting the genetic diversity within a tumor—not only the number of genetic mutations but how broadly particular mutations are shared within different subgroups of tumor cells. They first described this measure, called mutant-allele tumor heterogeneity (MATH), in the March 2013 issue of Oral Oncology. But that paper was able to show only that patients with known factors predicting poor outcomes—including specific mutations in the TP53 gene or a lack of infection with the human papillomavirus (HPV)—were likely to have higher MATH values.
In the current study, the investigators used MATH to analyze genetic data from the tumors of 74 patients with squamous cell head and neck carcinoma for whom they had complete treatment and outcome information. Not only did they find that higher MATH values were strongly associated with shorter overall survival—with each unit of increase reflecting a 5 percent increase in the risk of death—but that relationship was also seen within groups of patients already at risk for poor outcomes. For example, among patients with HPV-negative tumors, those with higher MATH values were less likely to survive than those with lower MATH values. Overall, MATH values were more strongly related to outcomes than were most previously identified risk factors. MATH values also improved outcome predictions based on all other risk factors the researchers examined.
The impact of MATH values on outcome appeared strongest among patients treated with chemotherapy, which may reflect a greater likelihood that highly heterogeneous tumors contain treatment-resistant cells, Mroz said. He also noted that what reduces the chance of survival appears to be the subgroups of cells with different mutations within a tumor, not the process of mutation itself.
“If all the tumor cells have gone through the same series of mutations, a single treatment might still be able to kill all of them,” he said. “But if there are subgroups with different sets of mutations, one subgroup might be resistant to one type of treatment, while another subgroup might resist a different therapy.”
In addition to combining MATH values with clinical characteristics to better predict a patient’s chance of successful treatment, MATH could someday help determine treatment choice—directing the use of more-aggressive therapies against tumors with higher values, while allowing patients with lower values to receive less-intense standard treatment, Mroz noted. While MATH will probably be just as useful at predicting outcomes for other solid tumors, that remains to be shown in future studies, the investigators said.
“Our results have important implications for the future of oncology care,” said Rocco, who is director of the Mass Eye and Ear/Mass General Head and Neck Molecular Oncology Research Laboratory and senior author of the Cancer paper. “MATH offers a simple, quantitative way to test hypotheses about intratumor genetic heterogeneity, including the likelihood that targeted therapy will succeed. The results also raise important questions about how genetic heterogeneity develops within a tumor and whether heterogeneity can be exploited therapeutically.”
The study was supported by National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research grants R01DE022087 and RC2DE020958, National Cancer Institute grant R21CA119591, Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas grant RP100233, and the Bacardi MEEI Biobank Fund. Mass General has filed a patent application for the MATH measure.
A new study from investigators at the Benson-Henry Institute for Mind/Body Medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center finds that eliciting the relaxation response—a physiologic state of deep rest induced by practices such as meditation, yoga, deep breathing and prayer—produces immediate changes in the expression of genes involved in immune function, energy metabolism and insulin secretion.
“Many studies have shown that mind/body interventions like the relaxation response can reduce stress and enhance wellness in healthy individuals and counteract the adverse clinical effects of stress in conditions like hypertension, anxiety, diabetes and aging,” said Herbert Benson, HMS professor of medicine at Mass General and co-senior author of the report.
Benson is director emeritus of the Benson-Henry Institute.
“Now for the first time we’ve identified the key physiological hubs through which these benefits might be induced,” he said.
Published in the open-access journal PLOS ONE, the study combined advanced expression profiling and systems biology analysis to both identify genes affected by relaxation response practice and to determine the potential biological relevance of those changes.
“Some of the biological pathways we identify as being regulated by relaxation response practice are already known to play specific roles in stress, inflammation and human disease. For others, the connections are still speculative, but this study is generating new hypotheses for further investigation," said Towia Libermann, HMS associate professor of medicine at Beth Israel Deaconess and co-senior author of the study.
Benson first described the relaxation response—the physiologic opposite of the fight-or-flight response—almost 40 years ago, and his team has pioneered the application of mind/body techniques to a wide range of health problems. Studies in many peer-reviewed journals have documented how the relaxation response both alleviates symptoms of anxiety and many other disorders and also affects factors such as heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen consumption and brain activity.
In 2008, Benson and Libermann led a study finding that long-term practice of the relaxation response changed the expression of genes involved with the body’s response to stress. The current study examined changes produced during a single session of relaxation response practice, as well as those taking place over longer periods of time.
The study enrolled a group of 26 healthy adults with no experience in relaxation response practice, who then completed an 8-week relaxation-response training course.
Before they started their training, they went through what was essentially a control group session: Blood samples were taken before and immediately after the participants listened to a 20-minute health education CD and again 15 minutes later. After completing the training course, a similar set of blood tests was taken before and after participants listened to a 20-minute CD used to elicit the relaxation response as part of daily practice.
The sets of blood tests taken before the training program were designated “novice,” and those taken after training completion were called “short-term practitioners.” For further comparison, a similar set of blood samples was taken from a group of 25 individuals with 4 to 25 years’ experience regularly eliciting the relaxation response through many different techniques before and after they listened to the same relaxation response CD.
Blood samples from all participants were analyzed to determine the expression of more than 22,000 genes at the different time points.
The results revealed significant changes in the expression of several important groups of genes between the novice samples and those from both the short- and long-term sets. Even more pronounced changes were shown in the long-term practitioners.
A systems biology analysis of known interactions among the proteins produced by the affected genes revealed that pathways involved with energy metabolism, particularly the function of mitochondria, were upregulated during the relaxation response. Pathways controlled by activation of a protein called NF-κB—known to have a prominent role in inflammation, stress, trauma and cancer—were suppressed after relaxation response elicitation. The expression of genes involved in insulin pathways was also significantly altered.
“The combination of genomics and systems biology in this study provided great insight into the key molecules and physiological gene interaction networks that might be involved in relaying beneficial effects of relaxation response in healthy subjects,” said Manoj Bhasin, HMS assistant professor of medicine, co-lead author of the study, and co-director of the Beth Israel Deaconess Genomics, Proteomics, Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Center.
Bhasin noted that these insights should provide a framework for determining, on a genomic basis, whether the relaxation response will help alleviate symptoms of diseases triggered by stress. The work could also lead to developing biomarkers that may suggest how individual patients will respond to interventions.
Benson stressed that the long-term practitioners in this study elicited the relaxation response through many different techniques—various forms of meditation, yoga or prayer—but those differences were not reflected in the gene expression patterns.
“People have been engaging in these practices for thousands of years, and our finding of this unity of function on a basic-science, genomic level gives greater credibility to what some have called ‘new age medicine,’ ” he said.
“While this and our previous studies focused on healthy participants, we currently are studying how the genomic changes induced by mind/body interventions affect pathways involved in hypertension, inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome. We have also started a study—a collaborative undertaking between Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Mass General and Beth Israel Deaconess—in patients with precursor forms of multiple myeloma, a condition known to involve activation of NF-κB pathways," said Libermann, who is the director of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Genomics, Proteomics, Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Center.
The study was supported by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention grants H75 CCH123424 and R01 DP000339, by National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine grant R01 AT006464-01, and by National Center for Research Resources grant M01 RR01032.
Adapted from a joint Mass General and Beth Israel Deaconess news release.
Researchers have known that two seemingly distant human maladies—a devastating set of hereditary disorders called Walker-Warburg syndrome and infection with the virus that causes hemorrhagic Lassa fever—both involve a cellular protein involving sugar.
Now an international team has discovered new genetic mutations that cause the severe brain, muscle and eye defects found in children with Walker-Warburg syndrome but also make cells insensitive to the Lassa virus.
The scientists found all known gene defects and identified new mutations in genes critical for coupling sugar groups to a particular protein receptor for Lassa virus, called glycosylated alpha-dystroglycan.
The team, which includes Sean Whelan, HMS professor of microbiology and immunobiology; Hans van Bokhoven of Radboud University Medical Center; and Thijn Brummelkamp of the Netherlands Cancer Institute, published their findings this week in Science.
Defects in how sugar modifies the dystroglycan complex causes Walker-Warburg syndrome, in which affected children usually die at an early age. The Lassa virus is one of many pathogens that hijacks this protein complex in order to enter cells.
Studying Lassa leads to syndrome clues
Viruses need to get inside host cells to amplify and cause disease. The Lassa virus gains entry by binding to dystroglycan, a protein complex on the outside of the cell. This protein complex is heavily decorated with sugars that anchor the cell to its surroundings.
To generate a detailed map of how Lassa virus enters human cells, as well as to identify genes required for successful infection, the scientists infected a unique human cell line in a lab dish. Because these genes are present only in a single copy, they can be readily inactivated. Until recently this genetic trick was possible only in model organisms, such as yeast and fruit flies.
Using the genetic approach of inactivating host gene function by inserting new genetic material, a technique called insertional mutagenesis, the team found human cells that were resistant to Lassa virus infection.
The scientists were able to do the Lassa work safely by replacing the surface protein on another non-lethal virus with the surface protein of Lassa and then testing the ability of that virus to infect and kill the haploid cell-line in which genes had been inactivated by insertional mutagenesis. Only those cells that lacked the components essential for Lassa virus entry survived the infection, whereas others died.
Walker-Warburg mutations identified
The identity of the genes associated with resistance was revealed by deep genetic sequencing of the surviving cells. Among them were genes that encode the known Lassa virus receptor alpha-dystroglycan as well as machinery required to add sugars to this receptor. Mutations in several of these genes are associated with Walker-Warburg syndrome, but not all of the genes had previously been linked with the syndrome.
Based on these findings, researchers scanned the genome of Walker-Warburg patients for defects in these newly discovered genes. Strikingly, several families affected by hereditary Walker-Warburg syndrome of previously unknown cause carried mutations in these genes.
Lassa virus is endemic in regions of Africa and causes thousands of deaths every year. The researchers said it will be interesting to see if, in communities exposed to Lassa virus, the human genome shows traces of the ongoing struggle in the sections encoding the identified host factors that are involved in building the sugar trees on the dystroglycan protein.
Adapted from a Netherlands Cancer Institute news release.
Cell biologists studying Parkinson’s disease are training their sights on mitochondria, the energy source of the cell, whose activity in neurons appears to go awry in this devastating neurodegenerative illness. A neuron needs its mitochondria to be healthy and mobile, particularly during their continual cycles of fission and fusion in which damaged bits are removed and healthy mitochondria are renewed.
A particular gene that is mutated in early-onset Parkinson's—a subset of the disease that can strike people in their 30s—has opened a window into a mechanism called mitophagy, an important component in this form of cellular housekeeping. When mitochondria are damaged, they must first be identified and then cleared away so they don’t fuse with and poison “good” mitochondria. In mitophagy, an unwanted mitochondrion is engulfed and degraded.
Fundamental biochemical pathway
The gene PARKIN and its regulatory companion PINK1 work together in this process, one that involves multiple proteins on the mitochondrial outer membrane that may ultimately serve as potential targets for treatments in Parkinson’s. PARKIN was discovered a dozen years ago, but only within the last couple of years have scientists pinpointed its role in mitochondrial quality control.
Wade Harper, the Bert and Natalie Vallee Professor of Molecular Pathology, together with his collaborator Steven Gygi, HMS professor of cell biology, led an HMS Department of Cell Biology team that has identified a fundamental biochemical pathway in which PARKIN resculpts the mitochondrial proteome—the full complement of mitochondrial proteins produced—to promote mitophagy. Harper and his colleagues published their results in Nature this week and share a web portal with a wealth of information about the proteins in this pathway.
The pathway that eradicates damaged mitochondria begins with a process called ubiquitylation. Ubiquitin is a small protein that modifies other proteins in many aspects of biology, including the response to damage that ultimately ends in ridding the cell of such waste. Understanding the sites of modification in target proteins is a key step in elucidating the role of ubiquitin in specific pathways, but this has been a technically challenging area of research. The Gygi and Harper labs recently developed a mass spectrometry-based proteomic methodology to identify ubiquitylation sites in target proteins, potentially on a global scale, and in the current study extended this to the PARKIN system.
Resculpting the mitochondrial proteome
“Identifying actual sites of ubiquitylation provides us not only a visual way to look at the structure and mechanisms of how the PARKIN system works, but it also gives you the potential in the future to make reagents that will let you look in tissue of the brain, for example, and determine whether the pathway is on or off,” said Harper.
In defining the near complete repertoire of PARKIN substrates—which they call the PARKIN-dependent ubiquitylome—the researchers reveal how the structure and function of the mitochondrial proteome is resculpted by PARKIN. Indeed, their work identified hundreds of ubiquitylation sites on dozens of proteins.
While this contribution does not have immediate clinical implications, it does serve as a key steppingstone toward a greater understanding of Parkinson’s and perhaps other neurodegenerative diseases involving mitochondrial quality control. This challenging work is necessary before contemplating ways to somehow overcome defects in genes such as PARKIN.
“We want to be able to use the data to understand in more detail how PARKIN is regulated and how it is activated and how it is capable of ubiquitylating a dizzying array of proteins on the mitochondrial surface,” Harper said. “In addition, we also want to try to test the hypothesis that ubiquitylation of specific mitochondrial proteins is critical for mitophagy.”