- Departments
- Medical Education
- Vanderbilt Hall
- Admissions
- Financial Aid
- Office of the Registrar
- Campus Planning and Facilities
- Ombuds Office
- Committee on Microbiological Safety
- Human Resources
- Office for Academic and Clinical Affairs
- Joint Committee on the Status of Women
- Finance
- The Academy
- Global Health Research Core
- @HMS
- Global Clinical Scholars Research Training Program
- HMA Standing Committee on Animals
- Office of Research Compliance
- Global & Community Health
- Harvard Medical School Event Calendar
- 2010
- 2011
- 2012
- Biography
- Contact @HMS
- Office of Diversity RIA Program
- Q&A Archive
- Research
- Talks@12
- The Dean's Perspective
- Videos
- Harvard Mahoney Neuroscience Institute
- OHRA Home
- Welcome Alumni
- Human Resources
- Calendar
- Contact us
- Intranet
- Dental Medicine
- Harvard University
News
Service, not ‘Scut Work’
February 6, 2013

Medicine is a service profession, two physicians said in this week’s New England Journal of Medicine, but depending on how “service” is defined, it can appear to conflict with medical education.
An opinion piece by Jennifer Cohn Kesselheim, HMS assistant professor of pediatrics at Boston Children’s Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Christine Cassel of the American Board of Internal Medicine cited a survey of medical residents by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. One question suggests service and medical education are opposed, asking whether one interfered with the other. While acknowledging that menial tasks devoid of educational value—known as “scut work” in residents’ parlance—have no place in training, the authors worry that trainees and educators might lose sight of the opportunities for enhanced learning that true service to patients can provide.
“We believe that service should not be a burdensome barrier to effective training that must be minimized or controlled to allow for unfettered learning,” they wrote. “On the contrary, resident duties that confer a high degree of service may still provide high educational value, in the form of genuine experience with patient care or—of increasing importance—understanding of systematic aspects of care that affect patient safety and care quality.”
For example, the authors asked, would repeated consultations about the same mild coagulation abnormalities before elective surgery be service or education for a hematology resident? Or, would staying late to see a clinic patient and missing a lecture harm a family practice resident’s education? These examples and others contain lessons in skill building and responsibilities to patients, the authors argue.
Framing service as education is important as medical educators seek to optimize physician training, Kesselheim and Cassel concluded. “As we train future physicians, we should convey the message that service to patients is fundamental to our professional role and an invaluable mechanism for learning.”
Read “Service: An Essential Component of Graduate Medical Education” at www.nejm.org.
Comments

