- Introduction to Clinical Research Training
- Medical Education
- United Kingdom Clinical Scholars Research Training
- Vanderbilt Hall
- Financial Aid
- Office of the Registrar
- Campus Planning and Facilities
- Ombuds Office
- Committee on Microbiological Safety
- Human Resources
- HMS Foundation Funds
- Office for Academic and Clinical Affairs
- Joint Committee on the Status of Women
- The Academy
- Global Health Research Core
- Global Clinical Scholars Research Training Program
- HMA Standing Committee on Animals
- Office of Research Compliance
- Global & Community Health
- Harvard Medical School Event Calendar
- Contact @HMS
- Office of Diversity RIA Program
- The Dean's Perspective
- Department of Pathology
- Harvard Mahoney Neuroscience Institute
- OHRA Home
- Office of Research Subject Protection
- Tools and Technology
- Alumni Association
- Cancer Biology & Therapeutics Program
- Celiac Program
- Department of Medicine
- HMS Community Values Initiative
- HMS Information Technology
- HMS TransMed Program
- Introduction to the Practice of American Medicine
- Office of Communications & External Relations
- Office of Global Education
- Shenzhen-HMS Initiative in International Education
- South American Clinical Research Training
- test page
- Safety Quality and Informatics Leadership
- Human Resources
- Jobs @ HMS
- Contact us
- Dental Medicine
- Harvard University
October 17, 2013
In two parallel projects, researchers have created new genomes inside the bacterium E. coli in ways that test the limits of genetic reprogramming, opening new possibilities for increasing flexibility, productivity and safety in biotechnology.
In one project, researchers created a novel genome—the first-ever entirely genomically recoded organism—by replacing all 321 instances of a specific “genetic three-letter word,” called a codon, throughout the organism’s entire genome with a word of supposedly identical meaning. The researchers then reintroduced a reprogrammed version of the original word (with a new meaning, a new amino acid) into the bacteria, expanding the bacterium’s vocabulary and allowing it to produce proteins that do not normally occur in nature.
In the second project, the researchers removed every occurrence of 13 different codons across 42 separate E. coli genes, using a different organism for each gene, and replaced them with other codons of the same function. When they were done, 24 percent of the DNA across the 42 targeted genes had been changed, yet the proteins the genes produced remained identical to those produced by the original genes.
“The first project is saying that we can take one codon, completely remove it from the genome, then successfully reassign its function,” said Marc Lajoie, a Harvard Medical School graduate student in the lab of George Church. “For the second project we asked, ‘OK, we've changed this one codon, how many others can we change?’”
Of the 13 codons chosen for the project, all could be changed.
“That leaves open the possibility that we could potentially replace any or all of those 13 codons throughout the entire genome,” Lajoie said.
The results of these two projects appearred Oct. 18 in Science. The work was led by Church, Robert Winthrop Professor of Genetics at Harvard Medical School and founding core faculty member at the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering. Farren Isaacs, assistant professor of molecular, cellular, and developmental biology at Yale School of Medicine, is co-senior author on the first study.
Toward safer, more productive, more versatile biotech
Recoded genomes can confer protection against viruses—which limit productivity in the biotech industry—and help prevent the spread of potentially dangerous genetically engineered traits to wild organisms.
“In science we talk a lot about the ‘what’ and the ‘how’ of things, but in this case, the ‘why’ is very important,” Church said, explaining how this project is part of an ongoing effort to improve the safety, productivity and flexibility of biotechnology.
“These results might also open a whole new chemical toolbox for biotech production,” said Isaacs. “For example, adding durable polymers to a therapeutic molecule could allow it to function longer in the human bloodstream.”
But to have such an impact, the researchers said, large swaths of the genome need to be changed all at once.
“If we make a few changes that make the microbe a little more resistant to a virus, the virus is going to compensate. It becomes a back and forth battle,” Church said. “But if we take the microbe offline and make a whole bunch of changes, when we bring it back and show it to the virus, the virus is going to say ‘I give up.’ No amount of diversity in any reasonable natural virus population is going to be enough to compensate for this wildly new genome.”
In the first study, with just a single codon removed, the genomically recoded organism showed increased resistance to viral infection. With several additional codons reassigned, a “wildly new genome” would make it impossible for engineered genes to escape into wild populations, Church said, because they would be incompatible with natural genomes. This could be of considerable benefit with strains engineered for drug or pesticide resistance, for example. What’s more, incorporating rare, non-standard amino acids could ensure strains only survive in a laboratory environment.
Engineering and evolution
Since a single genetic flaw can spell death for an organism, the challenge of managing a series of hundreds of specific changes was daunting, the researchers said. In both projects, the researchers paid particular attention to developing a methodical approach to planning and implementing changes and troubleshooting the results.
“We wanted to develop the ability to efficiently build the desired genome and to very quickly identify any problems—from design flaws or from undesired mutations — and develop workarounds,” Lajoie said.
The team relied on number of technologies developed in the Church lab and the Wyss Institute and with partners in academia and industry, including next-generation sequencing tools, DNA synthesis on a chip, and MAGE and CAGE genome editing methods. But one of the most important tools they used was the power of natural selection, the researchers added.
“When an engineering team designs a new cellphone, it’s a huge investment of time and money. They really want that cell phone to work,” Church said. “With E. coli we can make a few billion prototypes with many different genomes, and let the best strain win. That’s the awesome power of evolution.”
Funding was from Department of Energy [DE-FG02-02ER63445], NSF [SA5283-11210], NIH [NIDDK-K01DK089006], DARPA [N66001-12-C-4040, N66001-12-C-4020, N66001-12-C-4211], Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation, Department of Defense NDSEG Fellowship, NIH-MSTP-TG-T32GM07205, NSF graduate fellowship, NIH Director’s Early Independence Award [Grant 1DP5OD009172-01], U.S. Office of Naval Research [N000141010144], Agilent Technologies, Wyss Institute, and Department of Defense NDSEG Fellowship, and Air Force Contract #FA8721-05-C-0002.