It’s easy to marvel at the athleticism required to throw a 90-mile-per-hour fastball, but when Neil Roach watches baseball, he sees something else at work: evolution.
That ability—to throw an object with great speed and accuracy—is a uniquely human adaptation, one that Roach believes was crucial in our evolutionary past. How, when and why humans evolved the ability to throw so well is the subject of a study published online June 26 in Nature. The study was led by Roach, who recently received his doctorate from Harvard’s Graduate School of Arts and Sciences and is now a postdoctoral researcher at George Washington University. His co-authors are Michael Rainbow, HMS instructor in physical medicine and rehabilitation at the Spaulding National Running Center; Madhusudhan Venkadesan of the National Centre for Biological Sciences at the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research; and Daniel Lieberman, the Edwin M. Lerner II Professor of Biological Sciences at Harvard.
They found that a suite of changes to our shoulders and arms allowed early humans to more efficiently hunt by throwing projectiles, helping our ancestors become part-time carnivores and paving the way for a host of later adaptations, including increases in brain size and migration out of Africa.
“When we started this research, there were essentially two questions we asked. One of them was: Why are humans so uniquely good at throwing, while all other creatures, including our chimpanzee cousins, are not?” said Roach. “The other question was: How do we do it? What is it about our body that enables this behavior, and can we identify those changes in the fossil record?”
What they found, Roach said, were a suite of physical changes—such as the lowering and widening of the shoulders, an expansion of the waist and a twisting of the humerus—that make humans especially good at throwing.
While some of those changes occurred earlier during human evolution, Lieberman said it wasn’t until the appearance of Homo erectus, approximately 2 million years ago, that they all appeared together. The same period is also marked by some of the earliest signs of effective hunting, suggesting that the ability to throw an object very fast and very accurately played a critical role in humans’ ability to rise to the top of the food chain.
“The ability to throw was one of a handful of changes that enabled us to become carnivores, which then triggered a host of changes that occurred later in our evolution,” Lieberman said. “If we were not good at throwing and running and a few other things, we would not have been able to evolve our large brains, and all the cognitive abilities such as language that come with it. If it were not for our ability to throw, we would not be who we are today.”
To start unpacking the evolutionary origins of throwing, Roach began not by studying how humans throw, but how our closest relatives—chimpanzees—do.
Though they’re known to throw objects (often feces) underhand, chimps, on rare occasions, do throw overhand, but those throws are far less accurate and powerful than those of the average Little League pitcher, Roach said. Additionally, chimps throw as a part of display behavior and never when hunting.
Part of the reason for chimpanzees’ poor throwing performance, Lieberman said, is tied to their technique, which in turn is limited by their anatomy. “Chimps throw overhand using either a dart-throwing motion, where the elbow is extended, or much like a cricket bowler, where their elbow is kept straight and they generate force by swinging their shoulder,” Lieberman said.
“That led us to studying cricket bowlers and trying to understand what happens when you keep your arm straight, and why that diminishes your throwing ability,” Roach said. “Eventually, we began to think that changes in the way the shoulder is oriented with regards to the rest of the body could change the way you generate force when you’re throwing.”
To explore those physical changes, Roach and colleagues began by creating a complex model that incorporated current research about the biomechanics of throwing. Using that model, they were able to explore how morphological changes to the body—wider shoulders, arms that are higher or lower on the body, the ability to twist the upper body independently of the hips and legs, and the anatomy of the humerus—affect throwing performance.
In addition to the modeling, Roach performed a series of real-world experiments in Lieberman’s Skeletal Biology Lab using members of the Harvard baseball team and a host of braces designed to limit their movements.
The idea, Roach explained, was that by restricting certain motions, the players would be forced into a more primitive condition, giving him the opportunity to see how different anatomical shifts contribute to the mechanics of modern throwing.
Armed with a method known as inverse dynamics, Roach and colleagues were able to not only quantify how much restricting certain types of movements affected throwing performance, but they were also able to trace the effect to specific changes in the mechanics of each player.
“We try to push these bits of anatomy back in time, if you will, to see how that affects performance,” Roach said. “The important thing about our experiments is that they went beyond just being able to measure how the restriction affects someone’s ability to throw fast and accurately. They allowed us to figure out the underlying physics. For example, when a thrower’s velocity dropped by 10 percent, we could trace that change back to where it occurred.”
“In order to test our evolutionary hypotheses, we needed to link the changes we’d seen in the fossil record to performance in terms of throwing,” he continued. “This type of analysis allowed us to do that.”
What they found were three key physical changes that helped to make fast, accurate throwing possible.
Evolutionary changes in the shoulder show that, as a pitcher cocks back the throwing arm, “what they’re doing is stretching the ligaments and tendons that run across their shoulder,” Roach said. “Those tendons and ligaments get loaded up like the elastic bands on a slingshot, and late in the throw they release that energy rapidly and forcefully to rotate the upper arm with extraordinary speed and force.”
That rotation is the fastest motion the human body can produce. “The rotation of the humerus can reach up to 9,000 degrees per second, which generates an incredible amount of energy, causing you to rapidly extend your elbow, producing a very fast throw,” Roach said.
“Elastic energy mechanisms keep emerging as an explanation for high-speed motion in animals,” said Rainbow. “For example, frogs take advantage of elastic energy to power jumping. What’s fascinating about the shoulder is that we don’t know where this energy is being stored. I’m really excited to work with Neil and the rest of the team to determine what is going on inside the joint.”
Rainbow, a biomedical engineer at HMS and Spaulding with an interest in biomechanics, helped build the model the researchers used to analyze the throw and also assisted with the interpretation of the results. This work fits with his interest in the complex function of diarthrodial joints, including the intricate articulations in the wrist and mechanics in the foot during walking and running. Understanding the mechanical function of a joint is crucial before effective rehabilitation and injury prevention strategies can be developed, he said.
Beyond the shoulder, other evolutionary changes proved key to generating a powerful throwing motion, Roach said. A twist in the bone of the upper arm and an expanded, mobile waist both gave early humans the ability to store up and then release more of this elastic energy.
“The linchpin is really what’s going on with the shoulder,” Roach said. “When you see the shift from a chimpanzee shoulder to a more relaxed human-like shoulder, that enables this massive energy storage. Many of the evolutionary changes we studied, whether in the torso or the wrist, may predate Homo erectus, but when we see that final change in the shoulder, that’s what brings it all together.”
While the findings help shed light on a critical phase of human evolution, they also hint at a possible solution to a hotly debated question in sports: When it comes to young players, how much throwing is too much?
“It’s a tough question to answer,” Roach said. “The real difference, from an evolutionary perspective, is the frequency with which some folks throw now. To successfully learn to throw and use that ability to hunt, our ancestors would need to throw often, but nothing like the 100 or more high-speed throws that some baseball pitchers throw now in the span of a couple of hours.”
“I think it’s really a case of what we evolved to do being superseded by what we’re now asking athletes to do,” he continued. “Athletes are overusing this capability that gave early humans an evolutionary advantage, and they’re overusing it to the point that injuries are common.”
Ultimately, Lieberman said, the evidence points to one clear conclusion—the ability to throw with speed and accuracy is a uniquely human adaptation, one that played an immeasurably important role in human development.
“Recent research indicates that stone points—the oldest kind of spear point—are about 500,000 years old,” he said. “But people have been killing animals for at least 2 million years, and eating animals for about 2.6 million years.”
“That means that for about 1.5 million years, when people hunted, they basically had nothing more lethal to throw than a pointed wooden stick,” he continued. “If you want to kill something with that, you have to be able to throw that pretty hard, and you have to be accurate. Imagine how important it must have been to our ancestors to throw hard and fast.”
Adapted from a Harvard Gazette news story.
Stay informed via email on the latest news, research, and
media from Harvard Medical School.