- Introduction to Clinical Research Training
- Medical Education
- Financial Aid
- MD Programs
- Curriculum Services
- Program Evaluation and Student Assessment
- Student Services
- The Academy at Harvard Medical School
- Anatomical Gift Program
- Class Day 2014
- Teaching Awards
- Contact Us
- United Kingdom Clinical Scholars Research Training
- Vanderbilt Hall
- Financial Aid
- Office of the Registrar
- Campus Planning and Facilities
- Ombuds Office
- Committee on Microbiological Safety
- Human Resources
- HMS Foundation Funds
- Office for Academic and Clinical Affairs
- Joint Committee on the Status of Women
- The Academy
- Global Health Research Core
- Global Clinical Scholars Research Training Program
- HMA Standing Committee on Animals
- Office of Research Compliance
- Global & Community Health
- Harvard Medical School Event Calendar
- Contact @HMS
- Office of Diversity RIA Program
- Q&A Archive
- The Dean's Perspective
- Department of Pathology
- HMS NEXT
- Harvard Mahoney Neuroscience Institute
- OHRA Home
- Office of Research Subject Protection
- Tools and Technology
- Alumni Association
- HMS Information Technology
- HMS TransMed Program
- Office of Communications & External Relations
- test page
- Safety Quality and Informatics Leadership
- Human Resources
- Jobs @ HMS
- Contact us
- Dental Medicine
- Harvard University
Letters of Reference
Candor and forthrightness in letters of reference are of the greatest importance in maintaining standards of conduct and of quality among members of the medical profession. Such letters should include that information which the writer or any other prospective employer would wish to receive in order to make a well-informed decision; they should be inclusive rather than selective. The writer must recognize a responsibility to the person about whom the letter is written, to the person to whom it is written, to the institution in which the writer works, to the institution receiving information, and to society at large.
Ethical behavior and character should be addressed in a letter of reference, given that sound behavior and good character are essential to medical practice, teaching and research. On the other hand, letters should avoid unsubstantiated information that could unfairly damage an individual's career.
Although the writer may wish to have assistance regarding a letter's content and style, the ultimate responsibility for the letter resides with the author. If the writer is confused about what to include in a letter of reference, he/she may come to the Office of the Dean where either advice or referral to the University Counsel may be provided, if appropriate.
These principles apply to oral as well as written communications.
A faculty member should respond to a request for a letter of reference if he/she has reliable information, whether the information is favorable or unfavorable. A response is required from those in supervisory relationships or department heads.
Written responses may be supplemented by oral communications, but the letter should include all major points of concern and be consistent with subsequent oral information.
Letters of reference should be addressed to a named individual, not "to whom it may concern."
Each letter of reference should begin with a description of the sources of the information and the closeness of the relationship between the letter writer and the person about whom the letter is written. An assessment of the degree of reliability of the information should be included.
Hearsay evidence should be evaluated and verified, where possible, before a decision is made about inclusion in a letter of reference. If hearsay evidence cannot be verified, it is essential that the letter identify clearly which evidence is hearsay.
- The writer of a reference has an obligation to warn, where the case demands, as well as to support.
Adopted on April 28, 1982.